For more information on my paintings: NancyRynesStudio.com

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

A Change in Hunting Ethics for Brainard Lake Recreation Area, Colorado

Bull moose at Brainard Lake, July 2014 (photo by Nancy Rynes)


Imagine that you decide to take your family into the mountains for camping, hiking, or maybe a picnic at one of your favorite recreation areas just an hour or so away. The recreation area is well-known for its stunning views of the mountains and abundant wildlife, including several large bull moose. The moose here are so used to people that they tolerate photographers and wildlife watchers to get relatively close without shying away. You live in a very large, congested metropolitan area so being able to get away to a beautiful place like this in the mountains is very relaxing and enjoyable. Besides, your kids like the moose so much that they've named them and clamor to go up and see Henry and Buster any chance they can.

But this weekend will turn out to be terribly different from your past visits this summer. It's early on Saturday morning and your kids scramble out of the camper early so they can go check out the moose. After breakfast, you take your family  for a short hike to the lake. Everyone knows the moose always eat the willows around the lake in the early morning. It doesn't take long to find the two huge bull moose...a crowd of over a dozen photographers, a few other families with kids, and several more  people are within 50 feet of Henry and Buster. You notice that there are other moose in the area too, for a total of five. Your kids are excited to see these big, beautiful animals so close - most people in the country only see moose like this in books and on TV.

Suddenly you notice movement from a group you thought were simply wildlife watchers. Instead of raising a camera to get a photo, though, one man raises a bow and shoots off an arrow directly into Henry's side! Now instead of a beautiful scene of moose grazing on willows, a wounded, terrified, 1200+ pound bull moose bellows in pain and starts running around in terror. His panic sets off the other four moose and now there are five huge, scared, wild animals running around an area with dozens of now-terrified photographers and families. The wounded moose, still running, barrels through two groups of photographers. As you grab your kids and scramble to safety, you hope that no one was hurt or killed by the wounded animal. 

Henry finally collapses on the ground and dies. Buster, distressed, stands by the side of his deceased buddy.

Emotions start to build between the photographers and hunter, and the photographers express their disgust and displeasure as to what just happened. It's at this moment that you notice the friends of the hunter start throwing rocks at Buster, the remaining moose, trying to drive him away so they can pose with the now-dead Henry for their victory photos. Buster doesn't much appreciate having rocks thrown at him so starts to get aggressive. The photographers intervene and get the hunter's friends to stop throwing rocks. In stunned silence, you move your now-crying kids back to the campsite, trying to figure out how to explain to them what just happened.

The details of the incident are real (as reported by eyewitnesses) and happened at Brainard Lake Recreation Area on September 6, 2014.

Not a pleasant scene, is it?

But this was technically a legal hunt. The hunter had a proper license and permit, the area was open to hunting, and Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) officials supervised the hunt. But while this was legal, it was far from responsible, ethical, sustainable, and safe.
  • Innocent and uninformed wildlife enthusiasts were placed in harm's way by the hunt itself, its timing on a weekend, and CPW's lack of communication to the area's visitors.
  • The moose at Brainard Lake are habituated to humans and tolerate more close contact than animals even at Teton or Yellowstone National Parks. "Hunting" of these moose is effectively like killing a dairy cow in a corral.
  • Visitors to Brainard Lake go there to enjoy the scenery and wildlife. They don't expect to be placed in the middle of hunting season while they are camping or picnicking at one of the most popular parks in the Denver Metro area.

Some other facts to keep in mind:
  • Parks and Wildlife officials did not tell the photographers or other onlookers viewing the moose that a hunt was in progress.
  • According to visitors at Brainard Lake that Saturday, nowhere at the park entrance, in the parking lot, campground, on the website, or at the lake did they see clear signage to indicate that a moose hunt was in progress. There was no opportunity for visitors to make a decision to come back another time.
  • According to US Forest Service statistics, Brainard Lake Recreation Area is the most heavily visited site in the Boulder Ranger District, and is one of the most popular in all of Arapahoe National Forest.
  • This is a beloved picnicking, camping, wildlife-viewing, and hiking area for the Boulder-Denver metro area but is only slightly over 3,100 acres in size. Because of the multitudes of visitors using only limited facilities in a relatively small area, congestion is extreme. In fact, the usage to this area is so heavy that the Forest Service is considering alternative transportation options to lessen congestion.
  • The campground contains 47 campsites which are typically filled each weekend, so upwards of 150 people were camping within 200 yards of the kill site.
  • Many tourists come to Brainard specifically to see the large bull moose, some from out of state. Still others count the moose as an important secondary reason for visiting this area. The moose are an eco-tourism attraction. Allowing the big bulls here to be killed is a public relations and revenue fiasco in the making.

What We Propose for Brainard Lake Recreation Area

I am a member of a larger group who want to do something positive to change this situation. We are not against hunting; rather, we are in favor of safe, responsible, and ethical hunting practices. Let me reiterate that we are not against hunting (seems some folks are not seeing this). We are, however, calling for safer hunting regulations in areas that are heavily-visited by the public. These regulations already exist in other areas of Colorado and we feel they should be extended to Brainard Lake.

We propose working together with the Colorado Governor's office, Colorado Parks and Wildlife, the US Forest Service, and interested hunting and public groups to institute a plan that would allow for safe usage of Brainard Lake Recreation Area for visitors from Denver Metro area and beyond.
  • For the remaining moose tag this season, close the area to visitors on the day the hunt is in progress, and communicate to the public in advance (signage, website, etc) of what is about to happen.
  • For the future, institute a hunting exclusion zone, one mile in radius, outward from Brainard Lake (similar to what is already done at Mt Evans and in the moose habitat near Gould, CO) for the safety and enjoyment of the non-hunting public and the moose.  
  • Hunters would still be able to hunt on the Forest Service lands nearby, just not in the designated exclusion zone
  • This would allow the "eco-tourism" draw that the moose have to continue, as well as allow for continued hunting in that general area.  Recreation areas as beautiful as Brainard are gems because they are rare - the citizens of Colorado deserve a place they can go to enjoy this beauty and the wildlife without worrying about being injured by a hunt gone wrong.
  • Once an exclusion zone is established, if at some point in the future the moose become over-populated (as confirmed by a third party, uninvolved biological conservation organization or consultant), limited culling could be instated for one season, closing the park on the day or days the hunt takes place. In this instance, a weekday cull would impact the fewest visitors. This is similar to deer population control programs instituted at city and county parks in major metropolitan areas of the midwestern US.

What Will it Accomplish?

We have an opportunity to work together to create a plan beneficial for hikers, campers, picnickers, wildlife enthusiasts, the moose, hunters, the US Forest Service, and the State of Colorado.

Our biggest concern is for the safety and continued enjoyment of the non-hunting public who loves visiting Brainard Lake. We are also concerned for the moose themselves. If we continue to allow hunting at the lake, within just a few short years the big bull moose will be nonexistent there and the attraction they have for visitors AND hunters will be gone.

What will this plan accomplish?
  • Safety and enjoyment of the non-hunting public.
  • Continued moose hunting in the lesser-visited Forest Service lands in the area.
  • Continued enjoyment of one of the most beautiful and wildlife-rich recreation areas by the non-hunting public as an ecotourism draw.
  • Maintenance of a healthy population of moose close to a major metropolitan area, something extremely rare in the lower 48 states.
Precious few places exist in the US where the average person can easily and reliably enjoy being around these majestic creatures. Brainard Lake is one of the best, and it's a stone's throw from the Denver Metro area. We have an opportunity to create a positive outcomes - we can be proactive, taking a responsible, ethical, and sustainable approach to wildlife management and visitor enjoyment. Let's allow the moose to continue to draw in and delight tens of thousands of outdoors enthusiasts every year.

Nancy Rynes (primary author), Science Writer and Artist, Boulder, CO



An online petition for you to sign is available here:

http://www.change.org/p/gov-john-hickenlooper-change-in-hunting-regulations-at-brainard-lake





People you can contact right now to voice your opinion:


Contact the Governor of Colorado:


Colorado Parks and Wildlife:


To contact news agencies:


The Denver Post newspaper:


State Reps:


State senator:



11 comments:

  1. Nancy there are no signs that I have seen there that state hunting is allowed like in other areas in the state example Colorado Trail ,Boreas Pass ,Como are some places you see signs and not just one they also state Hunters be aware of what you are shooting but everything reads well to me

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nancy, I like it. I love the fact we have an issue with a proposed solution.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nancy, excellent solution for everyone.
    I was there and the moose split the crowd within a few feet of them after being shot by the arrow.
    Unfortunately, the CPW officer in charge at the scene is very eager to discount the safety of the people and wants his friend to get an easy trophy. The CPW helped this hunter for 6 hours and escorted him out so that he wouldn't be hurt by the other campers, photographers, and hikers.
    I talked with many hunters that were there enjoying the moose and they all said it was a very immoral hunt for the trophy and they would never hunt within close proximity and putting people in danger.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very nice, Nancy. Hopefully, we can encourage some of the more responsible hunters to work with us in the public arena. If not, this is a proverbial hill I'm ready to die on.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Take the next step and start a petition. Sometimes that is the only real solution.
    We were there visiting a few days before this cruelness happened.
    You need to stop these good ole boys before they put all of the moose to death.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you for a wonderful thoughtful article.
    My husband and I visited Brainard Rec Area shortly before all this happened.
    We thought that the moose were protected there s they were very tame around the people. Never did we feel threatened, but we were cautious to watch anyway.
    Why not follow to the next step with a petition with regards to many things that Nancy has brought up. This will maybe bring awareness to the situation along with some changes that was talked about.
    If not, I am afraid that these beautiful creatures who have trusted us and blessed us with their presence, will be slowly eliminated by others.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It sounds as though this is a commonly visited area for recreation? It doesn't seem proper that hunting would be allowed in a recreation area? Most importantly it is unsafe to the public. If it is a recreational area it should be posted as such and boundaries made to exclude hunting. In regards to the hunters, they are obviously not real savvy in regards to safety by the account I read above. I really think that although the hunt may have been legal, potentially endangering other people should be a consideration of the state in regards to this particular hunters prowess and reinstating future hunting privileges.

    ReplyDelete
  8. My wife and I also visited the area shortly before this happened. There was no indication we were in a hunting zone. I used to hunt for quite a few years but I use a camera now. The safety aspect of hunting was always number one thought. I was taught to always think of where other people, houses and cars might be. What this person was thinking we will never know. He was obviously not thinking or just thinking of himself.
    I was told that the DOW planted the moose in the area a few years ago. I have not been able to find out why they chose this area or what there reasoning was. They should have made the immediate area off limits to hunting. I would love to see a safe zone for the moose and other wildlife in this area. That would ensure a wonderful experience for all who enjoy the outdoors in that area around Brainard Lake. I encourage everyone to sign the petition and to call their local and state government officials and ask for a no hunting zone at Brainard Lake.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you for all your hard work... You've got my support

    ReplyDelete
  10. Apparently some people aren't actually reading my post. Please do, carefully.

    I will reiterate...I am NOT against hunting. I am FOR safe hunting. In a park situation like Brainard Lake is, it is up to Colorado Parks and Wildlife to manage multi-use in a way that doesn't put unsuspecting citizens in jeopardy as was done on this day. That may mean instituting a hunting exclusion zone around the lake as is done at places like Mt Evans. I don't see that hunters have a problem with an exclusion zone there or in Gould, CO...why then are some complaining about a safety zone here at Brainard?

    Another option might also be closing the park to visitors for a week and allowing hunting during that week. This would also protect the hundreds or thousands of visitors that lake area gets on a busy September weekend. That is my main concern. One would think it would be everyone else's concern too, especially Parks and Wildlife.

    I am not saying that we should get rid of hunting statewide, nor am I saying that we should get rid of hunting in Arapahoe National Forest. I am saying that the state needs to manage hunting in a high-traffic, park setting so that people (including little kids) don't get injured or killed when they're visiting for a picnic or camping.

    And for everyone's information, I was a hunter up until fairly recently. My father taught me how to hunt starting when I was very small. Yes, a girl with a rifle. Get over it.

    I mostly hunted deer. Dad taught me that safety should always ALWAYS be my main concern...not just my safety, but the safety of anyone else in the area. There were quite a few years where I didn't get a deer because other hunters wandered in and I wasn't about to put them in jeopardy. It's too bad that this ethic isn't as common as it used to be.

    So once again, let me state that I am NOT trying to abolish hunting or take your gun or bow away. I AM taking a stand that the state, and yes, every hunter out there, needs to be overcautious about keeping other people safe in a high traffic area.

    I don't think this is too much to ask.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Oh, and one other thing...ideally, what I would like to happen here is a dialog that would result in a fair resolution of the problem. That dialog should include the Governor, Parks and Wildlife, as well as select representatives of interested parties (hunters, hikers, campers, and other visitors). We have an opportunity to collaborate to come up with a safe resolution to this currently-unsafe situation. Let's put our egos aside and talk, intelligently and rationally.

    ReplyDelete